Post by OpheliaPost by OmegaPost by OpheliaPost by OmegaPost by OpheliaPost by OmegaPost by OpheliaPost by Brian-GaffI'm cutting this group again as nobody is using it.
Brian
I am sorry Brian. There seems to be no common interest for discussion.
That is the problem with such groups. I pointed out when I arrived how
uk.misc works I doubt this one will be any different.
What are your interests, Brian?
You see, mine are cooking and politics in which you have no interest.
You need to find a group which does.
Your interests are rather limited in number though with such interests
there is no doubt much time taken up.
I have several interests though in no particular order in how passionate I
feel them.
Gardening, photography, walking, shooting, astronomy, science, sex with my
three girlfriends though not all at the same time but treasure their
company as much also, the internet ... ideal for research and
entertainment as I don't have a television, writing, music from classical
to heavy rock, playing piano. After being married to a shrew for thirty
years and have four grown up children, very successful now in their
respective spheres, I suppose I should add as an interest, living alone in
a small country period cottage, it's bliss.
Ah, gardening and shooting, yes:) They are not something I discuss in the
groups:)
As for the rest ... ;-)
I have a Yilditz Elegant. Beautiful stock and engraved action SBS.
You?
I gave up on the shotguns a few years ago though I enjoyed rabbiting
with them for a long time, and yes, we or others ate the meat.
Nowadays with such wonderful advances in engineering and the advent of
precharged pneumatic air weapons, my choice is the Weirauch HW100 with
a 14 shot magazine. Devastatingly accurate and a clean kill out to 50
[.177 calibre] metres and no F.A.C. required. A hell of an outlay to
set up your rifle and charging kit at just over a thousand pounds. A
lot happier with a rifle though.
Glad you like it but I prefer a good old springer to the PCP. No
messing about and getting cylinders recharged or having to lug them
about, when out shooting. Everything self contained in a springer.
Post by OmegaGardening? I have about half an acre and backs onto a private wood.
There's a greenhouse I erected last year and the flagship, the cabin
and deck I built also last year, a beautiful place to sit and watch
the dusk come in, usually with a slurp in hand and the company of a
good woman, I live in a paradise, though my life hasn't always been
so. And as it goes cooler, then light the chiminea. Half the garden I
had to retrieve from a veritable jungle but all so worth it. Now have
fruit trees produce some food and setting things out for lots of colour.
Enjoy:))
Post by OmegaSet up a bird station a few weeks ago but find the squirrels take it
over sometimes. I like the furry critters and can't bring myself to
shoot them when they give me so much amusement at their mischievous
antics. I do realise, some regard them as vermin in some parts and
understand they can be destructive to trees, especially in the spread
of Sooty Bark disease in Sycamores.
But they are quite edible you know:))
I owned a Feinwerkbau 124 .22 for many years and still when I look at
magazines they are regarded the best springer ever made. It's still
in the family, my son has it now and regularly working well having had
a few 'new' springs over the years, he got rid of the "V" sights and
had a telescopic sight and confirms a very accurate weapon. Seals
were always changed at the same time so was brought back to new time
and again. Aesthetically the beech stock was cack but have walnut on
my HW 100, a piece of art.
The FWB is a fine rifle. I'm shooting a BSA Supersport in .177. It has a
scope but also still has the iron sights for backup. It is a very
accurate rifle and light enough for me even with the accessories. After
many years of using both I don't believe there is any difference in
effectiveness between .177 and .22 on suitable prey at appropriate
distances but I like the flatter trajectory of the .177. We have a
Crosman 1077 for shooting for fun in the garden:)
Post by OmegaI believe squirrels are delicious so if ever I feel the need to down
one, I'll give it a try. I believe there was a street market in
Cornwall earlier this year selling squirrels for food.
If you have them in your garden, get to it:) Treat them pretty much
like small rabbit so ok for frying as well.
There's been debate for decades about difference between calibres .177 and
.22 but there are good arguments for either. Most hunters say you need
the heavier calibre for the most effective kill but this is my experience.
Try hitting, say, a pigeon at 20 metres using a springer with a .22
calibre and with such a weapon with old fashioned sights it would be
difficult to go for a head shot so left with simply, hit the quarry
somewhere and hope 'impulse' will do it's work. Nine times out of ten the
pigeon will fly off which is not very polite. The only sure way to bring
in a pigeon with non F.A.C. air weapon is a head shot and over distance
the .177 calibre has a distinct advantage as up to 50 metres you can more
or less treat the trajectory as flat, [ we know it isn't true flat but the
deviation is slight so can be treated as such ]. The .22 calibre would
start to drop after 10 metres, still loads of power in it but then you
need to compensate your sights for distance.
Let us get back to PNP weapons for a moment. There is virtually no recoil
and the 'power' does not diminish at the muzzle even when cocked for hours
on end so the shooter can expect his weapon to deliver the same force,
shot after shot unlike a springer where the force diminishes quite
considerably depending on model and whether the shooter has kept his
weapon cocked for long periods, after perhaps 40/50 shots.
With a good PNP and the telescopic sight zeroed, the shooter can expect
complete accuracy, with my weapon at least, right out to 50 metres without
any adjustment to sights. With my .177 calibre HW100 if I aim and hold
the sight for a head shot, my pigeon will be dead and drop like a stone
which is a hell of a lot more humane than having the buggas fly off and
perhaps bleed to death. Clearly there must be some element of good
marksmanship as well! So we might argue these days with finer engineered
weapons, calibre versus calibre, versus weapon.
I mentioned 'impulse' earlier so if a mathematician comes along perhaps he
would explain in far more detail than myself.
omega
...unlike a springer where the force diminishes quite considerably
depending on model and whether the shooter has kept his weapon cocked for
long periods, after perhaps 40/50 shots.
when testing through a chrono. Besides which, why would you want to leave
gone so long without any chance of a shot when hunting on the move. The idea
a safe nor sensible practice anyway. Even if the only person in the house is
the real world ... just my opinion of course :)